Showing posts with label Time. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Time. Show all posts

Monday, December 1, 2014

Who should estimate activity durations and costs?


 
Depends on:1. Staff experience
2. Project novelty
3. Consequences of estimating errors

Project estimation is a complicated process, and for many types of projects
it is not done with much accuracy. Doing it well involves the contributors
who will be responsible for the work and the project leader,
and may also benefit from inputs of experts, sponsors, and stakeholders.
Regardless of exactly who gets involved, precision and consistency
rely on good process and metrics,



Establishing Objectives
=======================

Before any detailed, activity-level estimating can be done, there will be
high-level estimates for the project as a whole established by the project
sponsor and stakeholders involved in initiation. If the assumed cost and
duration are not consistent with the expected benefits and value, no
project will ever exist. These estimates may be based on some analysis,
or they may be wild guesses pulled out of the air; whatever their basis,
these initial estimates should be treated only as general goals. Although
they may also represent some known constraints, the initial top-down
estimates can be used only as provisional starting points. Setting a realistic
project baseline requires thorough planning, analysis, and detailed
estimates developed by the team responsible for the work.
Involving Activity Owners

Project planning relies on good requirements definition and scoping,
involving the stakeholders. The resultingscope
for the project provides the basis for a work breakdown structure,
 which at its lowest level defines the tasks that must be done to
complete the project. Each of these tasks will need both a duration and
a cost (or effort) estimate, and the best source for the initial bottom-up
estimates will be the assigned activity owner plus any other contributors
involved.

The first consideration for estimating will be the method chosen
to do the work. Effort and duration estimates depend strongly on the
approach and process to be used for the work, so once this is clear,
bottom-up estimates are possible. Other considerations for the initial
estimates include potential risks and any remaining unknowns, such as
any contributors who will be involved but are not yet assigned.

Involving Others
=============

For work where there is ample precedent and a lot of experience, the
estimates provided by those who will do the work may be more than
adequate. For work that is novel or where you lack experience, you may
want to get outside assistance. Involving peers in your own organization
or networking with contacts in professional societies may provide useful
information. Even getting quotations or proposals from outside service
providers (whether you are considering outsourcing the work or
not) can provide potentially useful insight. Again, additional considerations
will include risks and unknowns, such as just how comparable the
experiences and metrics developed elsewhere will be to your particular
situation.

Adding Your Inputs
===============

The final arbiter of project estimates needs to be you, as the project
leader, because ultimately it’s your project. In examining the initial estimates,
be skeptical of any that appear either too conservative or too
optimistic. Ask questions about the basis for the cost and duration estimates,
and probe to uncover exactly how the work is to be done. If you
are not convinced that the people providing the estimates know enough
about the work, ask more questions. Especially if the estimates seem
too small, challenge the owner to break the work down further (whether
you intend to track at that level or not).
Compare the duration and cost estimates, and test if they are consistent
given what you know about how the work will be staffed. If they
are not consistent, provide guidance for adjusting the cost estimate, the
duration estimate, or both. If staffing commitments for all of the work
are not in place, collect range estimates that will be refined later when
the skill sets of the contributors are known. If there are known risks
associated with the work, include an appropriate margin for reserve (to
be managed by you for the project as a whole, not to ‘‘pad’’ activity
estimates).

Finally, compare the bottom-up detailed estimates of cost to the topdown
objectives for project expense to see how much trouble you are
in. Consider options that might make sense for bringing costs more into
line with expectations if the variance is significant. Use the duration estimates
to build a preliminary schedule and test it against your project’s
timing goals. Again, if there are substantial differences, revisit options
that might realistically reduce durations. In all cases
where your estimates exceed your initial constraints, document the
information that you will need to negotiate a realistic baseline with your
sponsor before formally committing to a fixed project objective.
Regards
Kshitij yelkar
www.yelkar.com


 

Thursday, May 22, 2014

PMP Fast Tracking and Crashing

 
PMP Fast Tracking and Crashing
 
 

Hi Friends

This video is about Project Schedule compression Techniques which are Fast Tracking and Crashing

Here I have described with example and pmp exam question.

Regards
Kshitij Yelkar-PMP
Mumbai-India
 

Friday, May 16, 2014

PMP Exam Lesson Leared for Practice Questions.


This Post is for those who are preparing for PMP

Please find my lesson learned questions from all question set which I referred , this are failed question.

I used to referred after 2-3 exams. This are more than 600+ questions and knowledge area wise

https://www.dropbox.com/s/25aig2rsqxcb1hv/PMP-Failure%20Questions.xlsx

Regards
Kshitij Yelkar-PMP
www.yelkar.com
Mumbai-India

Keywords: pmp, project management, communication, human resource, procurement, Scope, Time, quality, risk management, integration, stakeholders,

Thursday, April 17, 2014

Discrete Efforts vs Apportioned Efforts vs Level of Efforts


Discrete Efforts vs Apportioned Efforts vs Level of Efforts

1.Discrete Efforts: An activity that can be planned and measured and that yields a specific output.
2.Apportioned Efforts: An activity where an effort is allotted proportionately across certain discrete efforts and not divisible into discrete efforts.
3.Level of Efforts: An activity that does not produce definitive end products and is measured by the passage of time.

These are three earned value management types of activities used to measure work performance.

In order to further explain:
Discrete efforts are actions that directly result in product, service or result or components of a product, service or result.

Example of discrete may include, but not limited to Working Software, Delivered Machines etc.

Apportioned Efforts hold direct supportive relationship to a discrete activity and can be measured in direct proportionate to a discrete effort.  Due to the direct proportion relationship with discrete activity, apportioned efforts may not readily divisible from work packages.

Example of Apportioned Efforts may include, but not limited to:  testing, inspection, verification, validation activities. These activities are performed in direct proportion to their associated main tasks.

Level of efforts includes project management activities which mainly involve those kinds of activities   which are needed to support the discrete and associated apportioned activities. The duration of these activities depends on the duration of the discrete and apportioned activities to which LoE supports.

Example of Level of Efforts may include, but not limited to: Daily stand up, release planning, and retrospective meeting in agile software development, project budget accounting, customer liaison, or oiling machinery during manufacturing, etc. Level of efforts mainly involves collaboration and coordination activities and these activities are repetitive in nature.

Regards
Kshitij yelkar
www.yelkar.com


Keywords: pmp, project management, integration,Time

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Estimation Techniques

 
Analogous, Parametric and Three Point Estimation (PERT) Techniques
 
 
 
 
 
Analogous Estimation- In the initial phases of project, when not much details are available with PM
for estimation, Analogous technique can be used. In analogous estimation, we refer to ACTUALS of
similar kind activity which was done in past i.e. Historical data. Here we try find out ANALOGY
among the activity which need to be estimated and some activity done in past.
We just take the Actual of activity from historical data and assign same value as Estimation for new
one.
For example - If in last project, a web page had taken 48 hours to be completed, the estimation for
new project's web page development will be taken as 48 hours, irrespective of the details of web
page that need to be developed.

Parametric Estimation - Here again we refer historical data, but this historical data will be taken
as PARAMETER or variable to calculate estimates. The accuracy level of parametric kind of estimation
is better than the estimations done using Analogous estimation.
For Example - In last project, a 10 Km long road was constructed in the budget of $20,000. Now in
new project, we need to construct 15 kms of road. So we calculate that in last project if 10 km was
constructed in $20,000, cost of 1 km = $200.
Now use this value as parameter to calculate estimate for new project = $200 X 15 = $30,000 is the
estimate using Parametric estimation technique.

Three Point Estimation -
Generally single point estimations are risker than 3 point estimate. For example: If you are going
to a destination and you have to give the time by when you will be there at destination what is more
confident answer: 1) I'll reach by 10 AM 2) I'll reach between 10 to 10:15 AM.
Similar concept is used in estimation of activities. Uncertainty and risk with single point estimate
that I need 100 PDs to do this work is more than if we consider 3-point estimation e.g. Most likely
I will finish in 105 PDs (M), however I feel I should be able to finish in 100 PDs(O), at max I'll
finish by 110 PDs(P). so using formula for Beta distribution tE = (tO + 4tM + tP) / 6, tE =
(100+4*105+110)/6 = 105. This estimate is more certain and less riskier
 
 
Keyword: Time, COST, project management, pmp, Estimation, PERT , 3 Points Estimation.

Regards
Kshitij yelkar
www.yelkar.com

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Resource breakdown structure vs Resource Histogram


Resource breakdown structure  vs Resource Histogram


The resource breakdown structure is a hierarchical representation of resources by category and type. Examples of resource categories include labor, material, equipment, and supplies. Resource types may include the skill level, grade level, or other information as appropriate to the project. The resource breakdown structure is useful for
organizing and reporting project schedule data with resource utilization information.

Resource breakdown structure 
 



Resource Histogram used by the project management team as a means of providing a visual representation or resources allocation to all interested parties. This chart illustrates the number of hours a person, department, or entire project team that will be needed each week or month over the course of the project. The chart can include a horizontal line that represents the maximum number of
hours available from a particular resource. Bars that extend beyond the maximum available
hours identify the need for a resource optimization strategy

Resource Histogram
 


 

Regards
kshitij yelkar
www.yelkar.com

Keywords :  PMP,Project Management , Time Management, Resource Histogram ,Resource breakdown structure 

Monday, February 24, 2014

Factors which impact the Project Estimation

Factors which impact the Project Estimation

There are Many factors can impact that, i am sharing some which may have higher impacts
1. Scope
2. Cost of Resource
3. Time lines ( if you need soon , you may need to pick some expensive options)
4. Risk (so high the risk high the contingency reserve )
5. Quality Policy ( cost of quality, if some process has to be followed it will generate cost )
6. Customer Attitude ( how easy or hard to take approval from customers)
7. Environmental Conditions (like inflation or attrition )

There may be many factors but this are the higher impact, Information received from experts in
discussion.

Regards
Kshitij yelkar
www.yelkar.com